Find a Lawyer

SAJID SOHAIL versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, QUAID-E-AZAM UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD

Sections 22 (r), 13 (3) and 34 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional application for dismissal of the applicant syndicate were appointed as registrars in the university, which were the services of a competent authority. Was. The applicant was suspended for no reason by the Vice-Chancellor of the University; no power was given to the Vice-Chancellor by section 13 (3) of the Quaid-i-Azam University Act, 1973, to terminate the services of the person arriving in Judicial 1. Was gone Under this law, the authority which was appointed was the Syndicate only under the order of the Syndicate which was the only authorized authority. The High Court observed that instead of taking appropriate steps to put the matter before the competent authority, the Vice-Chancellor himself tried to exercise the powers of the competent authority, and there was no question of regularity, where the powers What did not go well was the Vice-Chancellor's order was set aside as illegal and, without any legal authority, the Vice-Chancellor was instructed to put the matter before the syndicate within a specified period. property advocates from Khewra lawyer