NORTHERN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT (PVT.) LTD. versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (COMPANY LAW) SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
The High Court against the Ordinance of Sections 33 and 34 Companies (XLVII of 1984), Sections 263, 265, 484 (1), Proviso [as Companies (Ordinance) Ordinance (C of 2002)] and the Appellate Bench of the 485 Commission Appeal to the Appellate Executive Director (Company Law) to investigate the Appellant Company's affairs and to report the original order of the Commission Manitability to the Commission or its delegates, ie Executive Director (Company Law), under the Companies Ordinance 1984 5263 A confirmed appointment order can also be challenged in advance. The Ordinance of the High Court of Companies appeals under section 484 of 1984 or under section 485 and will apply to an order approved under section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act 1997 and other than the Companies Ordinance. , 1984 order appointment An inspector to investigate and examine the affairs of the company, could not take away the rights of any PK for lack of order Artie HC dismissed the appeal if not qualified
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Blitang lawyer