Find a Lawyer

IMRAN LATIF versus STATE

The business dealings between the parties in the Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail, and grant of further inquiries also confessed to the High Court that they had received the money, however they explained. That it was also part of another transaction. About six to six months after its issuance, the check-in was presented and about 10 months after its submission, the complaint was lodged and the complainant remained silent for so long and no explanation could be reached on the record, Had made this matter. Although his further inquiry challan was presented in court, but there was no progress in the trial, it was alleged that the punishment for the last one-and-a-half year sentence under Section 489F was behind bars. There was a substantial portion of the year and three years if a case was made to approve the bail, the bail should not be denied or withdrawn because the source of the sentence had to be decided by the trial court. Before the noise of the accused and before that stage, every accused was to be treated unjustly and could only be kept behind bars when the accused was required to be admitted under bail when required by law. immigration advocates contact from Kohat lawyer