Find a Lawyer

MST. GULZAR BIBI versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER, I.C.T.

Sections 45 and 172 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitions do not support any order of the District Collector's Court or Revenue Officer's Order for correction of such entries established by the Coalition, Fraud and Commissioner, But in the amending jurisdiction by the Commissioner, the parties are instructed to seek remedies from the civil court. In the absence of a fault in the face of the record, such joint orders were not amenable to jurisdiction. The record of real revenue clearly indicates a disruption, and such record was rife with beneficiaries. Respondents, whose names were first registered against some puppets, while in some instances their shares were raised without the acquisition of a title document while defendants had no decision or order or evidence in support of their entries. Didn't exist. Support such entries by ignoring the supporters The theory of section 45 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 can be corrected only by practicing fraud and when taking notice of the Revenue Officer, citizens spanning decades. In the litigation, justice will not be in the interest of the present matter. In fact, the commissioner was blinded to the factual position and for technical knock, the High Court set aside the defective order and restored the orders of the district collector and the commissioner. law firms from Kakul lawyer