Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MST. AZIZ BEGUM

Sections 182, 216, 221 and 223 of the Contract Act 1872 Principal and Agent Plaintiff alleged that it had employed the plaintiff as a plaintiff to collect a home for him under which the Plaintiff was initially The property was not paid for by the claimant at the expense of the amount provided by the claimant. The same finding that the cost of constructing the house for the defendants is not to be assumed that the defendant himself was invited as a plaintiff by the plaintiff at the expense of the defendant when the principal himself in favor of the plaintiff. Could not emphasize the appearance. To be your principal and defendant in the circumstances law firms from Khair Pur lawyer