Find a Lawyer

STATE versus ZAHOOR AHMAD

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 395, 397, 316, 412, 171, 148, 149 and 459 were not aware of the first witnesses who claimed to have identified the culprits in the light of the lantern in the first Information Report. There was no mention that the lantern was burning in the house. At the time of the incident or witnesses identified the accused in the light of the lantern, Section 161, CRC did not say in the statement of the eyewitnesses nor was it stated that it was recovered from the spot. In this regard, the relevant orders and orders of the High Court guidelines issued by the High Courts in this regard were violated by the magistrate who held the identity parade. It cannot be said in the presence that eyewitnesses can memorize the robbers' faces in which they were seen. Conflict recoveries reveal that the trial court provided support and concrete reasons for acquittal There is no strong or unusual basis for disturbing the trial court's intervention in acquittal of the trial court Refused advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer