Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMED SHAIKH versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND GAS, ISLAMABAD

Sections 2A and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Maintaining the Constitutional Appeal The Civil Service Procedure Past and closed transactions, the principle of Applicant Applicant was abolished on 28 8 1997 and it was represented by the Department on 18 9 1997. Was filed, after which he kept sending reminders. Authorized authorities did not file an appeal before the Service Tribunal until 19 10 2000 and Mobion requested us to reinstate it on the basis of a decision reported as PLD 2006 SC 602 in the case of Salam. File a Department Appeal within 30 days from the date of the termination order ie, 28 8 1997, which he filed on 18 9 1997, with the Department Appeal filed on time, the date of filing the applicant. Had to wait 90 days. The Appellate Court, ie 189 1997, and on the 90th day when it expired, the applicant could have challenged the closing order within 30 days before the service tribunal petitioner had not filed any such appeal before and he was merely seeking his department's appeal. The Department was pursuing the Appellate Authority to decide, while at the same time, Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 was declared ultra-virus of Arts 240 and 260 of the Constitution, as alleged in our salutation of the Supreme Court decision. Under, PLD 2006 SC 602 it has been reported that the applicant has been compensated under the order sanctioned by the authorities dated 28 8 1997. The collapse ended in a past and closed deal that could not be reopened at such a tense stage. The applicant was not entitled to any equitable relief in exceptional constitutional jurisdiction over any equivalent rule of law. family advocate from Zhob lawyer