Find a Lawyer

CHOUDHRY KHALID SAEED versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY

Section 42 abandoned the Properties (Top Over and Management) Act (XX of 1975), Sections 2 (a) and 11 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 2020 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), and VII, R 11 This is similar to the suit for declaration and the auction of the property abandoned by the government where the bid of the claimant is accepted on 279 1999. The plaintiff's failure to pay 75% of the bid amount due to a lawsuit against the government by a suit plot violator. In a written statement declaring it a successful bidder for the suit plot on 7 4 2006, the plaintiff requested that the plaintiff request a refund for the payment made through his letters, therefore, the case was not credible. Participated in the auction where the basis is, thus, he knew of the suit property occupied by the encroachment but the title to the suit property was never in dispute, thus, the claimant had to pay the remaining bid The payment was not allowed to stop, such letters filed by the plaintiff did not reflect his mind. Pay the rest of the bid money By means of letters to the claimant's return, such acts and conduct rendered him ineligible to maintain the case, which could not be ruled in his favor when his If the bid was accepted, the claimant had the right to sue the government, therefore, in the suit under O VII, R 11, CPC, the claimant was rejected. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hyderabad lawyer