SUNLEY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORISED OFFICER, KARACHI versus MUMAIR ASSOCIATES THROUGH ATTORNEY
A. VIII, R11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Suit for Specific Performance of the Contract, Leased to the Plant Scope Agreement, Although Sale of 950 Residential Plots Appeared but Partially Specific Survey of Their Correct Location The numbers were told and as far as the rest of the land was located, the agreement was completely silent except for the defendant's agreement that he had a small lease of land, no explanation or details about it. Who was not given What was it acquired, what was its history, what is its nature, right is given below it and what is specially associated with it. The agreement and the plaintiff were utterly silent on this aspect of the case where a document in which, in the present case, the plaintiff intended to convey a plot of land to the defendant by 950, had full details and details to be mentioned. ? Even the copy of the lease was not specifically attached to the lease, nor was it available on record, which only shows that the suit under OVII, R 11, CPC The lease did not exist.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ambela lawyer