Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI versus SAJJAD MUHAMMAD JAFFER

Appeal against section 417 and 265K, section 34, Pro Code and 36 V of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), sections 417 and 265K, allowed the application of the accused, CRPC acquitted them. ? The shipment of the underground roof was sent to the Government Laboratory for testing and the laboratory report was negative, followed by the Research Institute for Chemistry, which was informed by the Controlling Section 34 of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 was not. The laboratory had previously stated that there was no intoxicating substance in the consignment. The second laboratory was not a notified laboratory and its research officer, who submitted the report, was referred to the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997. Was not notified as an official to examine the contents of the narcotics. The laboratory and the officer who reported it did not fall within the purview of Sections 34 to 36 of the Drugs Act, 1997, in which case, the conditions of the law were not met, any illegal interference or Not to be outlawed, no intervention was needed to acquit the accused. property advocates from Naukundi lawyer