Find a Lawyer

MATAHIR SHAH versus STATE

Under the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 561A & 173 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324 and 506B / 34 Section 555A, the CCP scope case was investigated by the Investigating Officer who Submitted its report under section 173. The CCP petitioned the Judicial Magistrate, who refused to admit through an anonymous order, which was upheld by the trial court, and the applicant / complainant filed an unknown order against Prima against Section 6161A, CR. An application was filed under the PC, it appears that all material has been collected through investigation. The officer was considered by the magistrate and then passed an order on the merit and the validity of the High Court under section 6161A, CRPC, was not to be exercised in every case, but in appropriate cases. Should be used rarely. And the orders approved by the following courts should be placed on an issue when the two courts below come to the conclusion that the result will not work. Obtained if, as the case goes forward, no interference was required to fill the gap left by the Magistrate Investigation Officer and to act as an Investigation Officer of this case or to become a party, He only had to investigate the matter on the available material and it would depend on whether he disagreed with or disagreed with the police report, the lawyer for the applicant had failed to disclose anything illegal. Which is a misuse of the law practice which is appropriate, legal and legal how to become a advocate from Jaja Abasian lawyer