Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHOAIB WASTI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL

Section 9 (a) (iii), (IV), (vi) and (xii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 guarantee, grant of prosecution evidence and comments revealed that the charges against the accused could only be Are. Determined at the end of the trial, which requires a deep appreciation of the evidence to ascertain their involvement in the case, the allegations themselves are strange and there is no restriction to grant bail in the circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the accused was entitled to bail, without having to touch the provisional assessment and the merits of the allegations that could have been a prejudice to any party's case.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY, through Attorney v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Law Department 2009 YLR 149
• ABDUL WAHEED v. State 2009 MLD 151
• FAR EASTERN IMPEX (PVT.) LTD. v. QUEST INTERNATIONAL NEDERLAND BV 2009 CLD 153
• IBRAHIM FIBRES LTD. through Secretary/Director Finance v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/Revenue Division 2009 PLD 154
• SOHAIL JABBAR MALIK v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2009 PLC(CS) 155
• MATAHIR SHAH v. State 2009 MLD 156
• MEHRAN SUGAR MILLS LIMITED v. MARKET COMMITTEE through Authorized Officer 2009 CLC 159
• AJEEB v. State 2009 MLD 159

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

lawer from fb area from Nowshera Cantt lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes