SHRI MAHANT BAWA BAGU LAIGIR MAHARAJ versus DIRECTOR PARKS AND HORTICULTURE, CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT KARACHI
Article 199 Constitutional Petition The main complaint raised by the petitioner was against the Hydro Panchayat Committee, which was handling the affairs of the temple, the subject of the petition was to control the affairs of the temples between the Hindu Panchayat and the petitioner. Have to manage. The High Court had no material available on record to interfere with its constitutional jurisdiction; however, to satisfy the applicant, the High Court observed that the four plots that were being allotted by the authority were the temple. Will be owned and used solely for religious purposes, while the parties, who are fighting for their right to run the temple, will be subject to pending litigation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Multan lawyer
