AL-AHMED (PVT.) LTD. versus ANJUMAN FALAH-O-BEHBOOD, HAZARA MUGHAL GOTH
Prohibiting section 12 (2) order from fraud and misrepresentation The plaintiff had full knowledge of the order passed by the High Court in another case but he concealed the order and obtained the former party's judgment against the applicant. Made when an order, verdict or decree was obtained through fraud, misrepresentation or such order, decision or decree was passed by a court that had no jurisdiction; He had the right to challenge it and to call it back because after adding section 12 (the agitators can be left untreated) 2), The CPC had no other option left with the aggravated person, but to apply under section 12 (2), the CPC was not available to indicate that the plaintiff had violated Section 24, C.P. A petition was filed under C, which directed the court to transfer this second case. It was ordered to be tagged with the present case, thus, the earlier order and injunction were based on misrepresentation. The applicant had established the contents of section 12 (2), CPC and the decision was neither passed on merit. Nor was all the material available on record taken into consideration that the High Court had set aside the decision and the order passed against the applicants was allowed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
