Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art: 199 Constitutional Appeals Evidence of Tenant Bonds Evidence of Individual Need for Housing for Its Children Failure to Produce Children as a Witness Personal Needs and Rentals of its Children The rent was decided by the rent controller but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the eviction order was granted on the ground that the landlord had proved a great need by the tenant that the landlord The house failed to prove that he did not present his children as a witness and she only wanted to increase the rent. Failure to inspect the children from the owners whose occupation they wish to evict the tenant, according to their personal needs, would not be fatal if the landlord's statement on the oath was convincing and the tenant Failure to move his statements in cross-examination was denied or evidence was rejected and a sharp rule for quantum and quality of evidence could be formulated to prove the need for eviction of tenants. Is. To prove his personal need alone was sufficient to prove his personal need if he could satisfy a wise mind with the requisite intelligence that such a need was. In fact, for the sake of personal necessity, the owners had to state in their request the material facts which were merely due to the fact that the first person had shown that the requirement was in accordance with the law and was done in good faith. Went and did not have to explain to the nature of the business that he was demanding more rent from himself.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009
