Find a Lawyer

SULTAN AHMED versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 2/2/34 & 6060re were present when the complainant was located inside strange party hours during strange hours, it was alleged that he was known as the prosecution witness, The question of his misidentification could not be raised was sufficient evidence of the presence of prosecution witnesses on the immediately-filed FIR. The scene of the incident was designated in a gun-fired FIR and it was shown through evidence that at odd hours of the night the complainant entered the house and opened fire on the victim and identified him in the light of the light bulb. Eyewitnesses were fully supportive of the complainant's version of the retrieval; empty crime and medical evidence inside the enclosure of the gun recovery home at the defendant's request confirmed ocular testimony, not in any of the effective verdicts. Had also not experienced any kind of illegal interference or weakness. Under the circumstances, punishment and punishment of the perpetrators were maintained law firms from Mehmood Kot lawyer