Find a Lawyer

SATTAN KUMAR versus MUHAMMAD YOUSIF

Definition of Section 3 Evidence Complainant moved a revision request against the order passed by the trial court, whereby the applicant specifically dismissed the direct complaint filed under Section 3 of the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005 The applicant, in his direct complaint, alleged that after the purchase he had included this part of the agricultural land as a tenant and said that the part of the property was paying and But later he stopped payment of the same petition which he himself obtained from the applicant. Asserted that the defendant did not expel the applicant; unlawfully, unauthorized or forcible possession of the property, on the contrary, the applicant himself had included him in the possession of the disputed land. Was not implemented anywhere. It is alleged that the defendant belonged to the Occupation Group or was known to illegally occupy the land of the legal owner or to illegally occupy the member of the Land Mafia member. Due to the application of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005, the direct complaint filed by the applicant, was rightfully dismissed by the trial court review application. Not manageable, deleted in circumstances. r \ n famous high court advocate from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer