Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF S. KALIA versus STATE

Sections 497 Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII VI of 1947), Sections 5, 8, 22 and 23 of the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (LXXII of 2007), Sections 7, 8 and 20 of the Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 467 , 471, 477 Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984), Offer, Sections 2 (d) and 5 (6) Guaranteed A and 34 offenses, denying the case against the applicants, which is a foreign exchange company I was the director / shareholder, that they had set up an illegal parallel website, for which they engaged in illegal and secretly unregulated forex and reference trading, applicants. The mechanism of According to the report, there was no physical transfer of any foreign currency from Pakistan and as a result it was declared illegal through the foreign currency / reference trading. The applicants issued the laws and regulations of the State Bank of Pakistan. It also violated the terms and other laws, such as the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947. The Prevention of Electronic Crimes Ordinance, 2007 and the Conduct Regulation, 1860, which resulted in the deprivation of large amounts of foreign currency to the national exchequer, would have been received in the form of a commission, if the transaction was carried out by the regular State Bank of Pakistan channels. Was performed by The complaint was initiated on a complaint by the State Bank of Pakistan that it was directly linked to the crimes committed in connection with the banks and the cases under the Ordinance of the Banks (Special Courts), under the Criminal Tribunal, 1984 offense was a It was not uncommon for a white-collar crime, as most of the evidence was documented and the documents were filed before the trial for the High Court. best advocate from Bhuawana lawyer