Find a Lawyer

MRS. YUBA JAMIL ANSARI versus BANK AL-FALAH LIMITED

Sections 10 and 18 apply for leave to defend the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 132, 133 and 134 of the Bank Debt Collection Suite. Approval of Liability Scope Scheduling Loan Vacancies The bank filed a lawsuit against the borrower, mortgages and mortgages, while the bank guarantors filed a mortgage statement stating that they There is no information on debt restructuring and their consent was not obtained. The bank could not resolve the dispute without recording its evidence because of the refusal of the parties to the written evidence on its property documents, because deep questioning and investigation were needed to decide the question. Mortgages can be insisted only on the basis of the documents provided by the defense that the guarantors are bound or not guaranteed these things: Both suits are approved by the NTS for unconditional leave approval. The first case was made because a detailed investigation of the object was obtained through the recording of the evidence to appear He was allowed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• Mst. KHADIJA DAWOOD v. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, (KARACHI) EAST 2009 YLR 1165
• MUHAMMAD SALEH v. State 2009 YLR 1171
• MISBAHUDDIN KHAN v. BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH through Member (Land Utilization), Hyderabad 2009 MLD 1172
• Mian KHUDA BUX QURESHI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Auqaf, Zakat, Ushar Department, Old K.D.A. Building 2009 CLC 1175
• TAYYAB ALI, ALI BHAI KARIM JEE WAQF through Managing Trustee v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2009 YLR 1178
• SHIRJEEL ENTERPRISES through Proprietor v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, APPRAISEMENT, KARACHI 2009 PTD 1181
• GENERAL SALES (PVT.) LTD. v. Mrs. DAULAT 2009 YLR 1182
• SATTAN KUMAR v. MUHAMMAD YOUSIF 2009 PCrLJ 1186

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

registration advocate from Bolan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes