Find a Lawyer

versus

Sections (66 (2) and ?????) of the fact are obliged by the High Court to ascertain the fact unless it is specifically challenged due to an error or the absence of evidence. , Which is framed, should be supported, referring to the High Court for decision. , Depending on the fact that the expenditure incurred by the Assisi was the nature of the expenditure or the matter of the capital issue was determined by the Tribunal in favor of the Assisi and it was clearly found that the expenditure The nature of the taxation and such permission was not challenged by the Tribunal to ascertain the fact, the question referred to the High Court by the Tribunal on the issue of fact finding, completely misunderstood. Was deleted Pakistan, top advocate family court from Topi lawyer