Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ENTERIOR ENTERPRISES, ODROI AND EXPORT TAX CONTRACTORS versus PROVINCE OF SIND


People's District Councils Export Tax Rules 1976 R47 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Peoples District Council (Export Tax) Rules 1976, R47 discusses the receipt of export tax from the District Council to the respondent through the KR 47 Challenged to be against. The Council Rules 1976, in which it was speculated on the receipt of such tax through a public auction, that the petitioner's locus was to prove the constitutional petition against the approval of this lease and that only one provocateur. The fact that one can file such an application is due to the fact that the defendant has failed to act. According to Article 199 of the Constitution, it is not sufficient to maintain the application as required by law unless the applicant is no longer able to show that his personal interest in the performance of such duty in accordance with the law. That has been violated or prejudiced. There is no allegation in the petition that the applicant intended to take part in the proposed auction which was to be made on a specific date or that the applicant was preparing to take part in the proposed auction but his right to participate in the proposed auction. Was excluded because the respondent Local Council failed to hold the auction on the proposed date that the applicant has the right to participate in the public auction, as well as every other citizen of the country to maintain the application under Article 199 of the Constitution. Is not sufficient unless the applicant is able to show that he asserted this right S or that the claim of right was defeated, the denial was illegal \ or defendant

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Upper Deval lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.