Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SALEH MUHAMMAD versus SULEMAN


Sections 66 (2) and 4 (2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Regulation, 1972 [MLR 104] Foreign Assets (Declaration) Rule 1972 [MLR 105] Reference Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, while declaring the appeal of assimilation, were not stated Was that the amount of repatriation was not liable to be taken under any of the provisions of the Income Tax Act Tribunal, in fact, it was specifically found that the Department had repatriated under Section 4 (2) of the Act. Have misidentified the amount of, which would not be known if it was money. The Act is not assessable under any other clause of the question, as it is formulated, so the reference will not arise on the facts of the reference, therefore, it has been excluded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Murree lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.