Find a Lawyer

ANWAR-UL-HAQ SHAHID BARI versus T.M.A.

Section 3 (2) Intra-Court of Appeal Mentorship Efficiency Award of Emoluments and Pension Benefits Scope Employment of Local Government filed a constitutional petition, after which the Department was directed to appeal its decision on the occasion of its decision. Decide. The parties' view of the department was that the intra-court appeal was not practicable because the applicant had already taken advantage of the relevant department's treatment of the appeal. An appeal was filed before the relevant department before the constitutional application was filed, the intra-court appeal was not upheld and was dropped.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD TAJ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TAXILA 2014 MLD 1113
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. WALAYAT ALI alias WALAYATI 2014 CLC 1119
• RIAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2014 YLR 1120
• JUBILEE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE 2014 CLD 1122
• GHULAM RASOOL v. MANSAB KHAN 2014 MLD 1127
• JAVAID-UR-REHMAN v. SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI-CORRUPTION, D.G. KHAN 2014 PLC(CS) 1128
• GHULAM QADIR v. State 2014 YLR 1133
• ABDUL SATTAR KHAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1133

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

family advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes