The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 454 and 411 failed completely to establish the facts so that the houses could be convicted, with which the accused was charged, with a delay of more than two months. There was no explanation given in the case which was filed which itself was delayed. The complainant himself was not provided any evidence if the allegedly recovered articles were unusually of the complainant as he did not give specific details about anything allegedly stolen or removed from the shop. There has been no evidence in his possession that it has been reported. To establish the record that the stolen property was removed by the accused after breaking the lock from the complainant's shop, the crime and conviction were set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
