Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

STATE versus MUHAMMAD SACHAL


Railway Act 1890 Section 126 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 436 allegedly set fire to the railway cabin Only the prosecution's witness against the accused failed to connect it with the accused witness said that he had made the accused Was seen trying to escape the crime scene. Syed did not see the prosecution witnesses set him on fire in the cabin. When they chased the criminals, they started firing on him but in the same breath said that there were more people who started giving evidence of any evidence. By the way, the accused was not to be linked to the evidence of the crime. The investigating officer who linked the suspect to the crime was of a second nature. The prosecution failed to prove the accused guilty. The accused was acquitted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Patika lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.