Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUHAMMAD SACHAL

Railway Act 1890 Section 126 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 436 allegedly set fire to the railway cabin Only the prosecution's witness against the accused failed to connect it with the accused witness said that he had made the accused Was seen trying to escape the crime scene. Syed did not see the prosecution witnesses set him on fire in the cabin. When they chased the criminals, they started firing on him but in the same breath said that there were more people who started giving evidence of any evidence. By the way, the accused was not to be linked to the evidence of the crime. The investigating officer who linked the suspect to the crime was of a second nature. The prosecution failed to prove the accused guilty. The accused was acquitted attorney vs advocate vs counsel from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer