Find a Lawyer

GULZAR HUSSAIN versus WAPDA

R5 (iv) and (v) of the West Pakistan WAPDA Employees (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules 1978, R5 against the termination of employment law for the mismanagement of section 4 employees. Action was taken according to the provisions. iv) The Notice of Rule was not submitted in compliance with RV (A) and V (B) eligibility and discipline rules nor was there any temporary determination to impose fines nor was the employee demanded that He should demonstrate the proposed action against the employees. Was removed from the job only for short periods of five days due to unauthorized absence to show that the punishment given to the employees was not in any way proportional to the amount of his crime. I was not brought in to say that the employee was in the habit of leaving, leaving his post without leave so that his case could be brought in a case of mismanagement. Emplo was not legally sustainable to remove the employee from the job and he was not appealed. Was isolated. law websites from Sanghi lawyer