ASHIQ ALIAS KALOO versus STATE
Prohibited Order 1979 Article Article One of the 4 witnesses who was a witness on the occasion showed no property (heroin not involved) at the trial, nor was it stated in the witness statement that the contraband by the recovered property Was weighed in place of. The other witnesses who disposed of it were towed to a report of a shop near the Chemical Examiner that was not placed before the accused under Section 342, the CRPC showing a packet about which the Chemical Examiner had The source was sent under a letter of transfer, while not forwarded. The police officer in charge mentioned the letter to the Chemical Examiner in charge of sampling because he directly dismissed that he had been asked by the concerned officer to collect the sample parcel from which the packet sample had not been received by the complainant himself. Not a Navigation Officer, the case of the Federal Shariat Court is to be investigated, raising suspicion in the prosecution case, setting aside the convictions and convictions passed by the court against the charges and dismissing them from the charges.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sheikhupura lawyer