Evidence on the Section 10 (3) record shows that although fornication was repeatedly committed by the accused along with his daughter during the two years, the wife and the real son of the accused were witnessing the incident, but now No report was filed until then and he waited until he saw it. After the suspect's father witnessed the incident, the suspect was scolded, but the police did not report to the fact that everyone in the house had seen the incident, the accused, who was abusive and ugly. The crime was committed, he was allowed to remain in the house, the arguments did not stand, and the prosecutor's story looks suspicious, another aspect of the two-year-long delay in taking action against the accused was a request from the prosecution's defense. Opposed, the father of the accused was a dishonest man who appeared as a prosecution witness who deprived the accused His contribution to Dad, not only the real son of the witness and the real brother of the accused, but also the defendant's cousin and other defense witnesses. A defense witness was also set up in the family instability, the real brother of the accused and the real prosecutor's mother said that the prosecutor was of a bad character who had developed illicit relations with his aunt's son and three months after that. Earlier, he was caught in a questionable state. He was not charged with any hostility through litigation with defense witnesses, was charged, deserved to take advantage of the suspect, the court sentenced the accused and acquitted him of the sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
