FAZAL SHAH versus STATE
The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) was struck down by the accused, who were found guilty of the Sections 109, 323 and 354 of the Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3), 11 and 18 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 109, 323 and 354 of the A In a very cruel way and increased their hatred. The story continued to be supported by medical reports, evidence on record shows that witnesses had substantially improved their statements and more exaggerated statements before the trial court was established in the trial court. Had to Due to the bitterness and strife between the parties, the whole incident showed that the incident took place but only under the section 18 of Ordinance VII of 1979, on the broad day, the sanctions, dishonesty and dishonesty were reduced to the extent of 5 under 354. Changed to , PPC While convicted under 5323, PPC remained intact
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer
