Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MIR LUTF ALI TALPUR versus PROVINCE OF SIND


Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants Act (XI` of 1973), section 18, after withdrawing the notice on the charge of restoring the second post, withdrew the charge against the appellant. Went and there was nothing left after such allegations were returned. Justify that the appellant's change was set aside by the appellate authority and later accused of withdrawing the appellant, from which day he was entitled to all the benefits of his post. When he was losing in that way. For the second time in this case, the Sindh Servants Act has not been entered into section 18 of the 1973 Act, a restraining order preventing the costs of the appellant for the disputed period cannot be maintained, therefore, the appeal was not accepted and the order disappearing. Has been isolated.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Lower Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.