MRS. ABIDA IRSHAD BUTT versus SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE
Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Punjab Government Policy Letter Dated 16 10 1973 The Pro Pharma Promotion Officer is facing a departmental inquiry into serious allegations under suspension and hence its development was postponed when it was finally charged. When he was acquitted, he had to promote pharma from history. Upon which he was otherwise promoted, such officer's colleagues were promoted to the next grade on a fixed date while selection grades and development were halted due to pending inquiry against him. Was made and after that the officer was given a selection grade but not promoted from a fixed date or promoted to the next junior, the authority did not indicate that he was senior with others, pending inquiry. Was stopped because of publicity, then other officials were allowed to develop from a fixed date and Selection grade was held from the due date: After reversing the basic facts in view of the failure of the authority to attend, the official had the right to promote the date according to the policy letter dated 16 10 3 1973 And because such other officials were allowed to develop from a fixed date, such a clear distinction was not valid in the law order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Bhera lawyer