SARDAR GHULAM MEHDI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants (Talent & Discipline) Rules, 1975, R 4 Appreciating the gravity of the case of the appellant preventing acting as Superintendent of Police and effective control of the police force They were charged with assurances. On duty, when there was a riot in the district jail, which resulted in some prisoners escaping, it shows that the appellant was going to another station to attend a meeting at the relevant time. There was no hint of that. Until his return and it was the fault of his second income commander, who did not inform the appellant about the situation at the second station but the inquiry officer proceeded to disclose and speculate, though some of his observations point to the next two additions. Were supporting the appellant order application approved by the withholding authority. Appellant, with gross effect, was declared illegal and set aside in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Rawat lawyer