Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN BHATTI versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB

Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 R 6 (3) A formal inquiry notice of the Assistant Food Controller for alleged misuse of showcase bags was found briefly in the store under his supervision before the Chinese The bags were regularly inspected on the report of theft officer, these results indicate that the guards had stolen the sugar and that such guards were subjected to various fines by the deputy director. It is not found that the accused officer was involved in theft / shortage in any way and the alleged loss recovery and fine Fine penalties. As a competent authority officer convicted of guards, the recommendation of the same authority has been increased for two years on a regular basis that regular inquiry into the Assistant Food Controller (accused) is not considered necessary because it has been self-imposed in Chinese bags. Promised to collect the cost of Nowhere such a move was believed to have been obtained under alleged miss-customization and alleged mis-writing which had been obtained under strange circumstances, under strange circumstances, was held. And such a false document could not establish the basis for the showcase notice procedure. In the presence of a detailed investigation into the theft charges, it was not permissible to ignore the case, in the circumstances, by the authorized officer and the authority. Not properly implemented by the source was far less than a justification for the showcase notice, Assistant Food The controller was, in these circumstances, not guilty of misconduct but on its subsidiaries. inheritance advocates near Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer