CH. TAUQIR AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R13, Appeal Reviewed Appellant by Appellant, in which against his order to stop the increase, there was no mention of it. His review was also not banned. No explanation was offered for the delay in moving the review request, nor did the authority requesting an extension of the extension of time be rejected, and the applicant was put in a position to withhold time, Once the revision request has been rejected, it cannot be rejected, the appellant's revision request was never. Simply sending comments without intelligence would not mean that the petition was entertained and that it could be reprimanded, because even this limit could not be considered. It can be forgiven.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Rahwali lawyer
