Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

CH. TAUQIR AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB


Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R13, Appeal Reviewed Appellant by Appellant, in which against his order to stop the increase, there was no mention of it. His review was also not banned. No explanation was offered for the delay in moving the review request, nor did the authority requesting an extension of the extension of time be rejected, and the applicant was put in a position to withhold time, Once the revision request has been rejected, it cannot be rejected, the appellant's revision request was never. Simply sending comments without intelligence would not mean that the petition was entertained and that it could be reprimanded, because even this limit could not be considered. It can be forgiven.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Quetta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.