R 4 Appellant, block officer, forest department, allegations of negligence which resulted in the removal of a large number of trees belonging to the government were cut down by some persons, and at the same time deprived of five convictions. ; Pay cuts; stopping two-year hike with future impacts; compensation period and extraordinary leave without compensation The inquiry report states that two forest guards had reported the incident on the morning of the incident. I did know, but the appellant was notified in the evening when the entire forest was removed from the place of memo and FIR recovered from the incident. Appellant's argument is that he had included three appellants, including the appellant, in the inquiry report to prosecute those who cut down the trees from the forest, who was equally responsible for the loss. All had to be shared, the appellant was punished, which is not due to negligence. Holding the appellant, the appellant was liable to pay his share of the damages suffered by the Government, due to the severe punishment and negligence, he was kept under conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
