SAEED AFZAL versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, EXCISE AND TAXATION, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Punjab Services Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Civil Services Advertising Comments, The dismissal of the appellant who acted as an Excel and Taxation Inspector, negatively reports on the points that he was entrusted with the excise job but in detecting any matter. Failed. That he had childish habits and needed to move from home to district because he was in the habit of canceling his transfer through influence and he was a household child and wanted to post the facts of his choice on the record, however the appeal. Allegations and negative comments made against the user led to the conclusion that the reporting officer's evaluation was in no way justified by the ad's remarks
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Umer Kot lawyer
