Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAYYAS AKHTAR versus HAFEEZUR RAHROAN


Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973) Section 8 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Seniority Appellant already holds a post in Grade 14 when respondents have this post up to the Grade Service Tribunal. Delivered when they arrived at the end. This defendant was senior to the appellant seeking support from section 8 (4) of the Government Employees Act 1973, under which the conditions are governed by the development of seniority of public servants to the next level, such provisions are laid down. , Which had no help in determining advance promotion. The seniority service tribunal of the officers held at various positions held that the respondent was senior to the appellant and therefore promotion of the appellant's priority should be considered so it could not be supported, the appeal accepted, of the tribunal. Invalid order was set aside and the tribunal dismissed before respondents' appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Rawat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.