Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

FAYYAS AKHTAR versus HAFEEZUR RAHROAN


Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973) Section 8 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Seniority Appellant already holds a post in Grade 14 when respondents have this post up to the Grade Service Tribunal. Delivered when they arrived at the end. This defendant was senior to the appellant seeking support from section 8 (4) of the Government Employees Act 1973, under which the conditions are governed by the development of seniority of public servants to the next level, such provisions are laid down. , Which had no help in determining advance promotion. The seniority service tribunal of the officers held at various positions held that the respondent was senior to the appellant and therefore promotion of the appellant's priority should be considered so it could not be supported, the appeal accepted, of the tribunal. Invalid order was set aside and the tribunal dismissed before respondents' appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Kech lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.