FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus PUBLIC AT LARGE
Demand for late condolences on the basis of two factors on the 285-day ban on the request for a review of Article 188: one, that the appeal filed by the applicant government, by the decision of the Supreme Court on which the review request was made. Was granted and a remand for this case was obtained. , The concerned officials did not consider it necessary to examine the contents of the decision so as to inquire whether the government had any directive to act and two whose request was sent by the Supreme Court office itself without the applicant's request. Adherence to the instructions contained in the decision in the relevant office was delayed, delay in any of the points taken by the applicant was not sufficient, the functionary was obliged to remand whether it was on remand. See if anything. If the request was read and checked at the appropriate time and / or a copy was supplied, the request was made by the applicant. Within a certain time, the query
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Ghotki lawyer