MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus BASHIR AHMED
Articles 13 (3) and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199, jurisdiction to withdraw the scope of evidence for evidentiary evidentiary case The Court of Appeal has set aside the writ jurisdiction for personal necessity. Placing the withdrawal order on the appeal beat was reinstated in the writ jurisdiction that the appellate court's final was final and could not be interfered with in the writ jurisdiction, evidence of incorrect letters on record in the appellate court Were present, his finding, which was based on a misrepresentation of evidence, was unsuccessful and such order was not exempt from interference with the writ jurisdiction. Refused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Nooriabad lawyer