DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE versus MST. AMT-UL-QAYYUM
After the trial of the 7th XVII, Rr 3 and 2 Adjustment Trial, the defendant, after the adjournment, the right to present evidence after the adjournment was closed, the right to present the evidence was discontinued; After their failure to submit a record despite being postponed, seeking the ability to terminate the defendant's record and failing to make any promise to present the record to the defendant's next hearing date It is clearly shown by the defendant that the defendant's case fell into the nullity of the order. Claims XVII, R 3, CPC Adjustment were made at the request of the defendant and it should also be clear that the provisions of Order XVII, R 3, CPC were not only liable for the failure of the parties to submit evidence. There was a situation where a party, due to its act or omission, made it impossible for the court to consider the use of expression or to perform another task. Not necessary for further progress of the trial used in defendant's Order XVII, R 3, CPC treatment in the present case, which made it impossible for the trial court to make trial for trial. And for this reason, an unknown order cannot be interrupted. Revision deleted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
