Section 2n2 (b), 7 367A, Q 377 and 6 336 Qatil Amad, abducting or abducting someone for unnatural lust, intoxication, value of evidence without considering the Cage Mat Police. Concern was reported or, in consultation with the complainant, both the prosecution's witnesses explained sufficiently about the location of the incident, the location of the injury, by the prosecution's witnesses, the court stated. That he was the only one who had committed fornication with the deceased before. , Cut off his penis, and then turned it around to hide the evidence against him, and that only the accused was responsible for the victim's murderous Ahmed. Syed's witnesses persisted in all material aspects and successfully answered all the questions raised by the defense. The presence of the prosecution witnesses at the relevant time proved to be reliable and reliable. The parties concerned in this case were residents of the same area, and because of the acquaintance of each other, the witnesses' statements allegedly made the accused. There was no question of improvement, as the prosecution had no significant impact on the case, as the accused had a legislature. Eyewitnesses of the two described each incident they had seen at the scene of the incident. And they took advantage of the case to exaggerate the prosecution proved the ocular account through a good, strong, reliable and reliable eye-witness account, the medical evidence absolutely ocular account post-mortem examination report. , Had fully confirmed the ocular account act. Chemical Exim
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
