STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, FAISALABAD versus FAIZULLAH KHAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) A complaint against dismissal on a charge of misconduct has resulted in the State Bank employee being charged with fraud and misconduct and reduced change by fraud. And there is no defense opportunity and only the statement of the accused is recorded in the answer to the question. , Giving specific questions and explaining their conduct to the accused is not permitted. The Labor Court, through an appellate tribunal, issued a Labor Court amendment order allowing bank officials to conduct new inquiries from the stage. The Labor Court should have allowed a new inquiry because of fraud and abuse and if the employee was, in fact, a corrupt person, he could not be sued by the Bank of State.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Layyah lawyer
