PAKISTAN RAILWAYS THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER (P), LAHORE HEADQUARTERS OFFICE, versus LATIFUR REHMAN PIRZADA
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3a) Temporary Orders Withholding Applicants Temporarily Offers Matters in Applicants' Violation of Appeal Settlement Centrally, instead of being based on a divisional cadre Are protesting against the order related to. Neither the court nor any such document was negotiated by the Labor Court while accepting the Steel application, Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance was only attracted when there was a violation of law, settlement or award. If so, the order passed by the Labor Court was, however, unable to be sustained and therefore the Appellate Tribunal could have said that the applicants' initial case was remanded in labor court on the basis of absence of settlement. The petition was called for a hearing after it was presented as a settlement. The case is going on in favor of the applicants and how will refusal of the order result in irreparable injury to the applicants?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Faisalabad lawyer