GHULAM QADIR versus DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, MICROWAVE DEVELOPMENT II, MULTAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Recovery Benefits Employees allege that they mentioned in the affidavit referencing a medical report mentioning the wrong age, such as an Identity Card and Driving License Employer. I mentioned the imposition of a fine. Employer's dismissal of allegations of cheating the employer, depending on the medical report by the employees, in these situations, the employer is deceived and the entries in the identity card and driving license cannot be relied upon as otherwise listed. had gone. As a result of any inquiry, the appellate tribunal offered reinstatement but refused to return the benefits due to the specific circumstances of the case, as both the employer and the employee did not work, relying on various entries.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mailsi lawyer
