PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION(INTERCITY) UNIT, SIALKOT versus AMJAD PARVAIZ
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Inquiry Officer Inquiry Officer Domestic cross-examination of the accused under defective sentence could not be made on the basis of such inquiry report, the Labor Court reiterated with back benefits. Instituted, set aside dismissal. The case presented on the basis of such inquiry report, in those circumstances, was remanded but the Appellate Tribunal, hearing that the appellant's employer was not fit to burden with the previous benefits, maintained the Labor Court order but backed benefits. Not allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Gambet lawyer
