Find a Lawyer

MUNEER AHMED versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, LASBELLA AT HUB

OI, R 10 Balochistan Local Government Act (V 2010), Article 37 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application as interference of party applicants will directly affect those who interfere. There were no interrupting parties to hear the Election Tribunal, which was a necessary party, there was no legal barrier, obstacle or obstacle to interfering with the interlocutors as the application was accepted as a party. And the interlocutors were made a party to the constitutional petition, which was referred to as co-applicants. Will be treated.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015

• JAMAL KHAN v. SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT 2015 MLD 972
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. State 2015 PCrLJ 974
• NAIMATULLAH KHAN v. The NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, BALOCHISTAN 2015 YLR 980
• MUHAMMAD SABIR v. Mst. JANAT KHATOON 2015 CLC 1042
• HABIBULLAH v. IRSHAD AHMED 2015 MLD 1073
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, through Additional Collector of Customs v. HAJI BALLOW KHAN 2015 PTD 1080
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. SIRAJ-U-DIN 2015 CLC 1084
• GHULAM QADIR v. GOVERNOR OF BALOCHISTAN through Personal Secretary, Quetta 2015 PLC(CS) 1085

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2015 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes