SHAHDAD KHAN versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, RAWALPINDI
Article 5, Scheduled West Pakistan Family Courts Rules 1965, R6 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for Dissolution of Marriage The application for dismissal of the husband's case argument was that the wife was based in the UK and the family in Pakistan The court had no jurisdiction. The legal status of the Family Court was dismissed by the court in the case in which the application was dismissed in whole or in part in the jurisdiction in which the parties were living together or in the final residence. Jurisdiction in which the cause of action was not excluded. In the present case of Pakistan, the two parties were based in the UK at the time of marriage and last resided there together. Rule 6 (b) of the West Pakistan Family Courts did not apply to the facts of the present case in which the wife was not usually a resident. Pakistan, but both parties were based in the UK and their marriage ceremony and intercourse were also performed. Disagreements arose between the party councils in the United Kingdom and the decision was taken by the UK FEMA Council Birmingham. The wife filed a case before the Family Court in Pakistan for violating R6 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965. Wives were not given rights to dissolve wives in Pakistan Temporary visit to Pakistan Family Court in Pakistan will not be given jurisdiction to provide suit to family court in Pakistan in which case No jurisdiction for entertainment. Without any
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
