Section 265, 439 and 561 of a Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of criminal offenses by public servants, or by bankers. Dismiss the application for bribe under At 6565 K, the alleged seized amount of CRPC accuracy was a huge recovery even though it was a controversial piece of evidence, but, if any other reliable, direct, on record to prove the culprit Or if there was indirect evidence, its absence would not be included. Either way it would be beneficial to facilitate the acquittal of the accused who investigated the crime for which the accused was sent to trial, to decide the fate of the accused. Should be allowed to run the procedure prescribed by law, there were some extraordinary circumstances for abandoning the regular route and following the unusual route; after the arrest of the accused, some money was deposited into the bank account. Aki revealed his involvement in the crime. During the investigation, it was alleged that he was found involved in the commission of the crime, Stgash is without contest the appropriate time to prove your case, it can not be said that the prosecution had no case against the accused, the accused can be acquitted by the trial court. At any stage of the trial, but this power can be exercised only if the court concludes after the prosecution's hearing and alleges that the allegation is baseless. And in this case the Investigation Agency has provided some evidence / material
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
