RIZWAN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. versus ZAKA ULLAH NIAK, SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LAND), LAHORE
Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, Section 10 and 11 and Schedule: = Pakistan Administration for Vacant Property Act (XII of 1957), Section 16 (3) (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Citizens Withdrawal The Transfer and Sale Property Petitioner Society moved a writ petition against the Department's refusal to sell its controversial land settlement, which was not included in the area acquired for the University Campus Court and was asked if the applicant In the custody of the state, it should not be disturbed and then the order of the status was also approved. Another writ petition that authorizes the disposing of the disputed land to one of the parties and also to the informants in the order of the High Court approved the State during the order restriction and the applicant society as well as the University of Punjab. During the approval of the application for the sale of the land granted by. Allotment was also made before recording registration in connection with the conversion of land into compensation pool. The matter clearly made it clear that the land was disposed of in a dispute with the Settlement Commissioner through unsuccessful appeals and informational requests. Attempts were made to seek while the applicant had the luxury of applying for constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court to the society and even though the allotment was void. Nevertheless, no enforceable rights have been infringed for its enforcement, whereby the applicant community can maintain the constitutional application and may not be granted any relief, (i) the defendants have been granted land in dispute. Orders have been passed without legal authority, (ii)
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer