MUHAMMAD DEWAN versus FAZAL HUSSAIN
The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, Section 30 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 10, the controversial statements of witnesses on the basis of possession and the absence of mention of them in the sale deed, which came out later and Wendy. Had deposed himself that he had taken her. Separate part of the joint property was ineligible for physical acquisition. To maintain the objection to the limitation on the basis of possession will be necessary physical possession and the second such possession must be under sale. Registration date must also be taken into consideration. For the purpose of limitation where the earth was not physically capable of being captured
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Guddu lawyer